One of
Winston Churchill’s more famous speeches — the ‘Never Give Up Speech', if I may
call it that — was never delivered, at least not in the fashion (three words
repeated three times) and at the place (Oxford) that has entered modern myth. In
the midst of Britain’s fight for survival against the Nazis, Churchill did, indeed,
deliver a brief speech at Harrow School on 29 October 1941. In that speech the
phrase ‘never give in’ was thrice repeated or enlarged upon. The gist of the
speech was this: don’t ever give in unless honor or good sense dictates
otherwise. Churchill’s mythic speech came to mind this past weekend when I
along with others had occasion to watch Atu, a spotted brown kiwi, being fed by
a keeper at the Otorohanga Kiwi House & Native Bird Park. Otorohanga is a
small town south of Te Awamutu.
The
keeper, employed in that task for three years, was still unaccepted by Atu. Atu put up an unforgettably relentless resistance to the keeper’s ‘invasion’ of her
cage. She thrust her pointy beak at the keeper’s boots and at her calves. She
kicked the keeper in front and from behind. She did all these things again and
again. As hungry as Atu must have been, she but twice or thrice darted to the tin
plate of morsels, then quickly returned to the attack. She didn’t stop
attacking until the keeper left the enclosure. The only thing lacking was the
good sense by which Churchill had qualified his admonition to the Harrow boys.
In every other way Atu’s behavior was Churchillian to the max and all the more
astonishing because of the size disparity between keeper and kiwi.
When the
keeper joined the spectators, who’d watched from the other side of the glass,
she told us that kiwis are intensely territorial. Indeed. And that Atu, while warm
and cuddly with other keepers long known to her, had yet to strike up a
familial warmth with this particular keeper. Kiwis aren’t known for ferocious,
unprovoked, and unwarranted attacks. They are nocturnal creatures, rarely
encountered in any event, pretty much minding their own business. But as we
saw, their own version of ‘never give in’ can come out in the right
circumstances.
All of
which raises the question, why are kiwis (among other New Zealand endemic
birds) threatened with extinction? Part of the answer lies in the clearance of
their native forests to make way for agriculture and human habitation. But a
more insidious cause of kiwi decline (and of the disappearance of whole species
of New Zealand birds) has been the predatory behavior of the numerous mammals introduced to
New Zealand, whose only mammals before human arrival were bats and seals, along the coasts. First came the dogs, pigs, and (inadvertently) rats brought by
the Māori. Eventually, rabbits were introduced. And then to control the rabbits,
‘possums’ were introduced. These ferret-like creatures aren’t to be confused
with North American possums. The story of alien creatures introduced to the
country is far more complex than space or my ignorance allows. But you get the
idea.
Not only
were New Zealand’s animals affected, so were plants. After all, many plants
depend on specific animals for propagation and sustenance. Native forests (as distinct from plantation forests) have been reduced to 1% of the land, much of it mountainous or on small, offshore
islands. Kiwi eggs and kiwi hatchlings provide easy targets for the likes of
the possum. And so, absent even more human interventions, the kiwis (and other
endemic species) are threatened with extinction.
Should
they and other endangered animal and plant species be saved? The easy answer
seems to be ‘yes’ but ‘yes’ is costly. Even costlier perhaps might be a ‘no’.
I’ll leave the arguments for ‘yes’ and ‘no’ and for 'how' and 'why' for perhaps another time. In any
event one can’t help but note that at least in the central North Island the
preservation efforts seem to have come from the bottom up, from local
initiatives. The Otorohanga Kiwi House germinated from an idea tossed around by
a bricklayer, pharmacist, and physician in the late 1960s. Eventually
various local organizations, groups, and funders were drawn in to bring the
idea to fruition in 1971.
An even
grander scheme with even broader support across the North Island and New
Zealand has been the creation and development of something called the Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust (‘MEIT’). The MEIT is a community-based
effort drawing in support from volunteer groups and organizations (green
groups, the Lions Club, etc.), corporations, private parties, and governments.
Much of the trust land incorporates land on Mount Maungatautari (or ‘the
Maunga’) previously set aside by the Waipa District (in the Waikato Region) as
a scenic preserve.
In the MEIT, 34 square kilometers (13.1 square miles) are
protected by 47 kilometers (29.2 miles) of so-called 'Xcluder Pest Proof Fence', a
special, impenetrable fence developed reportedly in response to the MEIT project. Following the removal or extermination of alien species on the Maunga, numerous endemic New Zealand species have been re-introduced,
including kiwi. Kiwi hatchlings have now survived on the Maunga, thanks to the
eradication efforts protected by the special fence. Additional developmental history of the Maunga 'eco-island' (if you will) is provided in Wikipedia.
Following, below are some pictures taken this past weekend on or near the Maunga, when
Jean and I and friends visited the eco-island. None of our pictures are intended to capture the
beauty and magnificence of the place. Only a visit can do that, I suppose. As it happens, the MEIT is conducting a photo competition to gather striking photos for its 2014 calendar. Capturing the beauty of the Maunga forest is no easy task, despite the beauty that abounds there.
Smaller eco-islands exist in New Zealand. Presently the
MEIT is the largest eco-island on New Zealand’s mainland. One can’t help but
wonder whether some day the Maunga will be but one of a number of similarly
sized islands that constitute an eco-archipelago crowning New Zealand. Whether
something like that ever happens will be for Kiwis to decide, of course. Siting
and funding eco-islands surely is no easy task. The commitment, toil, and
treasure required to develop the Maunga eco-island may at times have made for a
seeming Mission Impossible.
In
looking forward to comparable efforts elsewhere it may be best to remember
Churchill’s Harrow speech, not as it was spoken but as it is (apparently)
remembered in contemporary culture. ‘Never give in’ almost surely alludes (as
Churchill meant it to allude) to an Enemy. But ‘Never give up’ — as Churchill’s
speech is remembered — also allows
for the possibility that our undoing may not be from without but from within, from
apathy or indifference or ignorance or despair.
I suspect these ‘spiritual
vices’ (if I may call them that) were the most significant hurdles to be
overcome in realizing the Maunga eco-island. But thanks (in part) to some
Churchillian Kiwis, the Maunga eco-island came alive and is sustained. New
Zealand is the better for it, thanks be to God. And visitors are welcome; just no alien animal species, please.
Warm
regards,
Tim &
Jean
Fern Koru in the Maunga Eco-Island |
Xcluder Fence at the Maunga Eco-Island |
Xcluder Fence into the Distance |
Interlocking Entryway for Visitors at the Maunga Eco-Island |
No comments:
Post a Comment